Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Quite a few people are not aware of their rights, at the T.L.R.C. we are only here to inform you that there is more to the First Amendment then you have been led to believe: 

The first amendment of the uNITED States constitution says in part:

“Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of grievance.”

The supreme Court of the uNITED STATES agree:

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349

Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d

 

State of Idaho v. Horiuchi

... towards the gen- eral government. . . . If [the people's] rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. Page 3. ... http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/rubyridge/idhoriuchi60501.pdf

Highlights ours

 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT RESPONSE

 

Request to terminate UCC

 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT RESPONSE2

 

Reconsideration attempt

 

Jury Trial Demand

 

Letter to opposition attorney

 

Motion to Disqualification Judge

 

Change of venue request

 

Scanned Documents

 

WELCOME TO THE t.l.r.c.tripod.com  

   

(To get more useful info visit the following sites: legal-

                     legal

          legalies.tripod.com/legalredress

          ucc.idiots.tripod.com

          t.l.r.c.tripod.com

As of December 21, 2006 we averaged 1138 visit to our site we appreciate all of your interest. 1138 and we do not advertise. 

In April of 2007 we will relocate to the world wide web and we will advertise. E-Mail us and ask how you can either help or join our team vodier@netzero.net 

     Attach this to subject section of e-mail "T.L.R.C. INQUIRE"

As of April 15, 2007 (TAX DAY) we will be assisting those who need help registering LIEN’S with the credit bureaus, to do just that.

     T.L.R.C. Att: Jones  P.O. Box 343; Sch’dy, NY., 12301 

We will also provide a service to stop creditors from harassing Citizens...  As the process continues more updates will follow in FEB 2006 please be patient......)  A lot of new information added 04-15-07!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      

More information is to come.

 

 

 

Brent Jones

P.O. BOX 343

Schenectady, New York, 12301

                                     

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus, aka Brent Jones aka Brent O. Jones aka Brett Jones Theophilius, Brett Jones-Theophilius, aka Keeffe T. Branch, Keefe T. Branch, aka Keith Branch, aka K.T. Branch, aka B.J. UCC 1-207

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725-TJH

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

 

Motion to Disqualification Judge

Communication does not conform to

Rules….

(this should be more specific and “

Largely comprehensible).

 

 

                     It has already been brought to this court’s attention that the judge presiding over this matter has a UCC financial one statement filed against him and several other members of his court, that simply means ethical conflict of interest.

 

                  My documents conform to rules of court and was submitted timely, so I submit this request to have this matter readdressed by the presiding judge of this court. Due process requires that this case be given a fair hearing. The documents that were filed and accepted by the court that has the stamped date of August 15, 2006 and was received August 03, 2006 in the same envelope were the counterclaim and other motions, which was not filed even though they contained the original signature on the original document.

 

                  This court has determined to hold this respondent to a standard that no other respondent or petitioner is required under the rules of civil procedure for the Federal district court. The court has repeatedly returned document stating that the copies did not have an original signature. The court failed to recognize the following rule:

 

L.R. 11-4.4 Conformed Copy.  Copies shall be conformed to the original but need not be executed. Conformed copies shall be identical to the original in content, pagination, additions, deletions and interlineations.

 

                  Therefore copies do not require a signature, please correct me if I’m wrong.

 

              And now he insists on hearing a default judgment stating that I failed to provide a response and answer to the original complaint. When the court received several documents from the respondent, requesting a

 

jury trial, change of venue, appointment of counsel, counterclaim, ect..,

 

              Then the court- insisted on continuing to communitate with documents that were not legible, and despite the Plaintiff’s did not request for leave to amend complaint.

 

               I have continued to request of the court to provide legible correspondents in accords with the rule:

 

L.R. 11-4.3 Carbon Copies.  If a copy is a carbon, it must be the first carbon and clearly legible.

 

Apparently the court seems to believe that it is above its own rules, knowing that there’s a conflict of interest, it did persist in and stays on violating my due process rights. I say again united state constitutional amendment title eighteen sections 241, 242 Makes it clear “deprivation of rights under collar an authority of law”,

                  is against the law.                 

 

            I have clearly documented the above information so as to protect my interest, I demand the following:

 

1.    Suspension of court rules

2.    disqualification of judge

 

3.    Appointment of Counsel

4.    The filing and acceptance of all documents previously submitted to the court- as well as postal compensation.

5.    Setting aside of the default judgment requested by the plaintiff.

6.    Change of venue

7.    Instructions to the clerk of the court regarding the

acceptance filing a pro se documents, that they’re to the reviewed and filed with a little less a literary, has brought out in sparks vs. united states.

 

   I demand a swift and immediate ruling on this matter, as I am

entitled to due process and to equal protection of laws.

 

                Telephonic hearing was requested timely, yet the court held a ex’parte hearing with the plaintiff, in violation of rules of civil procedures.

 

          We have a problem, that problem is Judge Hatter due to his abuse of discretion, Gate-Keeping, deprivation of due process rights under color and authority of law, mispersion of felony, all violations of secured constitutional rights, but the one and foremost deprivation is the right to petition my government for redress of GRIEVENCE has been blocked, and or denied my self, the first amendment says Congress “shall make no law prohibiting”, so if this is my legal right why are you people interfering with it?

 

                 For the sake of this matter any and all correspondence must be addressed to the attorney of record BRENT JONES and not Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus. If not addressed appropriately communication will be returned for non compliance with civil rules of proceedures (Please see attached exhibit J).

 

 

                  As far as the disqualification of judge motion per-haps

Dale s. Fisher should have read the two addendums accompanying that motion. Solomon said, (Proverbs 18:13) 13 When anyone is replying to a matter before he hears [it], that is foolishness on his part and a humiliation.

 

               Please stop being foolish, transferring this to a differ judge is the only acceptable and prudent conclusion. It goes like this (James 4:17) 17 Therefore, if one knows how to do what is right and yet does not do it, it is a sin for him.”

 

          My God is Jehovah he is stronger then your court system. So as you keep getting technical I will wait for this to occur: (2 Thessalonians 1:6-10) 6 This takes into account that it is righteous on God’s part to repay tribulation to those who make tribulation for YOU, 7 but, to YOU who suffer tribulation, relief along with us at the revelation of the Lord Jesus from heaven with his powerful angels 8 in a flaming fire, as he brings vengeance upon those who do not know God and those who do not obey the good news about our Lord Jesus. 9 These very ones will undergo the judicial punishment of everlasting destruction from before the Lord and from the glory of his strength, 10 at the time he comes to be glorified in connection with his holy ones and to be regarded in that day with wonder in connection with all those who exercised faith, because the witness we gave met with faith among YOU.

 

 

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                         

                       

                  The aforementioned is true and correct under penalty and a copy of the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Jane Odonnell

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated:  11/14/06

                                       Brent Jones

By the way this is my official digital signature, this will remain on file throughout all proceedings.

                              Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated: 11/14/06

                                              Brent Jones

The forgoing may also be viewed via the internet at     

http://legalies.tripod.com, http://ucc.idiots.tripod.com and is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT    

 

 

Brent Jones

132 Jay St. 17

Schenectady, New York, 12305

                                     

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus, aka Brent Jones aka Brent O. Jones aka Brett Jones Theophilius, Brett Jones-Theophilius, aka Keeffe T. Branch, Keefe T. Branch, aka Keith Branch, aka K.T. Branch, aka B.J. UCC 1-207

                   Respondent,

          vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725-TJH

Motion:  

Declaration in opposition

 

                     In the Plaintiff’s motion “DECLARATION OF JANE O’DONNELL

WITH A COMPENDIUM OF UCC FINANCING STATEMENTS FILED BY DEFENDANT WITH THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE, SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUD BY THE COURT PURSUANT TO F.R.Civ.P., RULE 55(b)(2) AND LOCAL RULE 55”; it is unclear what the plaintiff is declaring.

 

                      Is she saying that the lawfully received and filed UCC financial one statements were filed without merit? Or that she now represents

 

the other debtor’s in un-relating matters?

 

1.    If it is the position of the plaintiff to introduce new material, how is it that she has not submitted a petition for leave to amend complaint?

2.    There are at least 46 UCC financial one statements filed against the plaintiff’s in the state of Colorado, should I not be allowed to ask why haven’t the plaintiff brought a suit against the secured parties of record? And would the court like for me to secure copies of those non related matters, and submit such copies as proof of the right of the right of adverse party to file such a complaint , petition with the secretary of state?

 

                  Again documents were received by the court and filed prior to default Judgment request, there by rendering such a request moot. And if that were not enough, the lawful access to the court was forcibly blocked by the keepers of the gate, now how is that equal protection of laws?

 

                  Documents were returned because they did not contain an original signature on copies, however I thought the rules only required that the original need have signature affixed… maybe I was wrong????????????? Nope I was not, J for the rule(s) of the federal district court for the United states;

                        L.R. 11-3.4  Original; Copies.  The original of a document shall be labeled as the original and shall consist entirely of the original pages, except as otherwise allowed by these rules.

 

                                    And

 

                        L.R. 11-4.3  Carbon Copies. If a copy is a carbon, it must be the first carbon and clearly legible.

                                  As well as

 

                        L.R. 11-4.4 Conformed Copy.  Copies shall be conformed to the original but need not be executed…..

 

                 I bring to the courts attention that the “Counter-claim / answer” was returned because the copies did not contain original signature…. Yet other documents executed in the same fashion were accepted, included a demand for a JURY TRIAL, WHY was that the case?

 

                        Introduction of new informatiom:

 

                        The plaintiff keeps making request amending original complaint, and counsel continues to submit new evidence, without taking leave. Due in part to the introduction of new evidence under the principles of the rules, and in accords with rules, the court cannot consider such material, without there being a request for leave to amend the “first Amended

 

Complaint”, and without such a request the request for default judgment must be denied. I demand a redress!

 

                  The original complaint requested the UCC finical 1 statement for December 06 be removed, that was done prior to the filing of default judgment request. A new UCC finical 1 statement (06-7083569236) was filed adding other debtor’s, and original UCC finical 1 statement (05-7053517407) was terminated! They must under rules of civil procedures, seek leave to file an amended complaint.

 

                  The court can not accept any new evidence without allowing a lawful response. Default judgment request must be denied. An answer to each of the questions in the body of this pleading require, a written response as well as REDRESS! Oral argument is not requested as of this time.

 

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                          

                       

                  The aforementioned is true and correct under penalty and a copy of the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Jane Odonnell

 

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated:  11/21/06

                                       Brent Jones

By the way this is my official digital signature, this will       remain on file throughout all proceedings.

                              Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated: 11/21/06

                                              Brent Jones

The forgoing may also be viewed via the internet at     

http://legalies.tripod.com, http://ucc.idiots.tripod.com

 

 

Brent Jones

P.O. Box 343

Schenectady, New York, 12301

                     Disqualification of Judge ADDENDUM 

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                         In and for the State of California

 

Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus, aka Brent Jones aka Brent O. Jones aka Brett Jones Theophilius, Brett Jones-Theophilius, aka Keeffe T. Branch, Keefe T. Branch, aka Keith Branch, aka K.T. Branch, aka B.J. UCC 1-207

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

Motion to set aside

Disqualification of Judge

request. Demand for change of

Judge, venue and counsel

appointment! Telephonic hearing request.

 

                

                  The respondent has been accused of not engaging in the battle, and having failed to respond. And yet the facts showed different, several documents that have been filed with this court, please take special

note the one demanding “default judgment, petition for redress demand for jury trial, counterclaim”. Those items were mailed on July 19, 2006, August 01, 2006 you might excuse me, but that appears to be an attempt to engage in the battle. 

 

                     Each of the petitions that were filed with this court was done so timely and must be construed as a response. They also contained several points that can only be construed as nothing short of a response.

 

                      It has already been brought to this court’s attention that the judge presiding over this matter has a UCC financial one statement filed against him and several other members of his court, any rulings, any judgments, any decisions that has been made were an abuse of discretion.

 

                      The plaintiff have requested a date of October 23 for hearing, I informed the court that that did not fit within my time schedule, I requested the hearing be rescheduled at least three months in advance, because of my being 3,400mi; away, only to be ignored.

 

                      The plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond to The Commercial Lien, they acknowledged that they received the documents and that they willingly failed to respond. And there is no document, court filing, certified mail receipt to show that they at any time attempted to engage in a battle regarding the charges allege by the respondent in the Commercial Lien affidavit.

 

                     I have already provided the state of California supreme court case law, case law of the united states supreme court, case law annotated of the united states constitutional amendment, supporting the fact that “a party must be given notice” . . . well I’ll let you read it for yourself:

 

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.,

 

395 U.S. 337, 349 Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d

 

A CLAIM OF LIEN WAS FILE PURSUANT CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 2872, 2874, 2875, 2881(1), 2883, and 2889, against Lien Debtor(s) for default and breach of contract under commercial law. Section 3281 of Civil Code for damages sustained. California Government Code § 27297.5 and 27387 as an involuntary lien based on consensual actions by knowledgeable breach of contract. UCC 9-401 (a) (3)

 

 

The first amendment of the uNITED States constitution says in part:

 

               “Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of grievance.”

 

                  Now let’s state the obvious, “only the secured party on the UCC financial one statement form can terminate the filing”

 

                  This is a non-judicial process, it was pre-judicial

 

                  Jury trial has been demanded, filed and accepted by the court, and in support of that document I submit the following “proof of Gate-Keeping”. All documents were in accords with rules yet rejected by the court.

 

                  Demand is hereby made for orders by the court to either suspend rules as is allowed by rules of the court, or to appoint counsel who is more familiar with legalese (official language of the u.S. courts) and its mundane technical rules.    

 

            We have an abuse of discretion, Gate-Keeping, deprivation of due process rights under color and authority of law, mispersion of felony, all violations of secured constitutional rights, but the one and foremost deprivation is “the right to petition my government for redress of GRIEVENCE”

which has continually been blocked, and or denied my self, the first amendment says Congress “shall make no law prohibiting”, so this is my legal right!

    

                   Telephonic hearing request for November 29 2006 regarding the above matters, and to set aside default judgement .

 

                   If a default judgment was requested of this court back in August how is it I have yet to receive such a request copy?

 

                    The judge presiding over this matter has a UCC financial one statement and criminal complaint filed against him and several other members of his court, any rulings, any judgments, any decisions that has been made, were done so with prejudice and abuse of discretion. Change of venue is demanded.

 

                  The plaintiffs have filed with the government their petition for redress of GRIEVENCE (a civil lawsuit) asking the government to correct the wrongs they allege having been done them. If the court allows the suit to proceed they can not under law of due process and equal protection invalidate in any form, fashion, or way the respondents petitioning of the government through uniform commercial code his redress of grievance.

 

                 I request and demand a Jury Trial.

 

                 Address change has been given all parties, any documents received at the previous address will return to sender at undeliverable. As you received address change notification for a reason.

 

                         Certificate of mailing                                                                                                  

 

                         The aforementioned is true and correct under penalty and a copy of the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Jane O’donnell

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92688

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated:  10/22/06

                                       Brent Jones

By the way this is my official digital signature, this will remain on file throughout all proceedings.

                              Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated:  10/22/06

                                              Brent Jones

 

The forgoing may also be viewed via the internet at     

http://legalies.tripod.com, http://ucc.idiots.tripod.com and is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT    

 

 

 

Visit our other sites

 

vodier@netzero.net

 

http://vodier.paradyne.tripod.com/

 

http://vodier0.tripod.com/

 

http://vodier0.tripod.com/                             

 

http://vodier2.tripod.com/  

 

http://vodier3.tripod.com/

 

http://vodier.tripod.com/together
 

http://vodier2.tripod.com/generalphotoalbum 
 

http://vodier.tripod.com/together
 

http://vodier0.tripod.com/thisisit

 

http://vodier3.tripod.com/

 

http://legalies.tripod.com/legal