Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Quite a few people are not aware of their rights, at the T.L.R.C. we are only here to inform you that there is more to the First Amendment then you have been led to believe: 

The first amendment of the uNITED States constitution says in part:

“Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of grievance.”

The supreme Court of the uNITED STATES agree:

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349

Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d

 

State of Idaho v. Horiuchi

... towards the gen- eral government. . . . If [the people's] rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. Page 3. ... http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/rubyridge/idhoriuchi60501.pdf

Highlights ours

 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT RESPONSE

 

Request to terminate UCC

 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT RESPONSE2

 

Reconsideration attempt

 

Jury Trial Demand

 

Letter to opposition attorney

 

Motion to Disqualification Judge

 

Change of venue request

 

Scanned Documents

 

WELCOME TO THE t.l.r.c.tripod.com  

   

(To get more useful info visit the following sites: legal-

                     legal

          legalies.tripod.com/legalredress

          ucc.idiots.tripod.com

          t.l.r.c.tripod.com

As of December 21, 2006 we averaged 1138 visit to our site we appreciate all of your interest. 1138 and we do not advertise. 

In April of 2007 we will relocate to the world wide web and we will advertise. E-Mail us and ask how you can either help or join our team vodier@netzero.net 

     Attach this to subject section of e-mail "T.L.R.C. INQUIRE"

As of April 15, 2007 (TAX DAY) we will be assisting those who need help registering LIEN’S with the credit bureaus, to do just that.

     T.L.R.C. Att: Jones  P.O. Box 343; Sch’dy, NY., 12301 

We will also provide a service to stop creditors from harassing Citizens...  As the process continues more updates will follow in FEB 2006 please be patient......)  A lot of new information added 04-15-07!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      

More information is to come.

 

 

 

 

Brent Jones

P.O. BOX 343

Schenectady, New York, 12301

                                    Amendments

                        In the uNited States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus, aka Brent Jones aka Brent O. Jones aka Brett Jones Theophilius, Brett Jones-Theophilius, aka Keeffe T. Branch, Keefe T. Branch, aka Keith Branch, aka K.T. Branch, aka B.J. UCC 1-207

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725-TJH

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

 

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

Change of venue request

 

 

                 As to whether or not I have acted in good faith (Being convicted felon that I am), let’s say with some leading authorities would say:

 

1.                            I request a change of venue, because I’ve been accused of violating the law, accused of illegal acts, I’ve been accused of acting criminally. That could only mean one thing, the transference of this case to criminal court division.

2.                            Terry J. Hatter Jr. Susie (Susan) Coane, Sherri R. Carter, Ralph Zarefsky, Terrie (Terry) Baker, Judie (Judy) Mathews, Estrella Tamayo, Denise Johnson are all individuals who have been formally accused of interfering with this respondents rights, in the past and now continues in an on-going conspiracy. 

 

                        We hold these truths to be self evident “That all men are created equal”, the so called founding fathers didn’t make those words up, for at acts 10:34, 35 “Jehovah is not partial... in every nation the man…is acceptable to him”. It is uniquely nice to know that our founding fathers recognized the sovereignty of every man, and as a sovereign citizen of the uNITED States, the constitution makes it against the law, a criminal act to harm a sovereign citizen.

 

                    This is a matter of commerce, failure to act, breach of contract, failure to perform, failure to fulfill obligation, failure to provide, failure to negotiate, failure of good faith, violation of constitutionally secure rights, of ( the first, the seventh, the eighth, the ninth, and tenth amendment), as well as title eighteen of the criminal code of the united states constitutional amendments (U.S.C.A.), and lastly other Federal and state laws that is cognizable by every other state in the union.

 

                    Please keep in mind that the uniform commercial code is recognized by every government throughout the world who engage in any means of commerce among and between other nations. It is under these rules that the U.N. is able to sanction commerce between nations it. 

 

                 However it is the first amendment right of every citizen “to petition the government for a redress of grievances”, that is the most secure

of all rights and can never be denied “Congress shall make no law”. No judge, no horse, no tree, no building, no book, no man, no law exists that can take away this right.

 

                        For years I’ve tried to get the petitioner to acknowledge their role in depriving me of the ability to enjoy life among other constitutional rights, only to be ignored. And because of one small piece of paper for which they were forewarned now they seem to be paying attention. Who would’ve thought that one small piece of paper could cause so much understanding?

 

                  By the way the plaintiffs have filed with the government their petition for redress of GRIEVENCE (a civil lawsuit) asking the government to correct the wrongs they allege having been done them. If the court allows the suit to proceed they can not under law of due process and

equal protection invalidate in any form, fashion, or way the respondents petitioning of the government through uniform commercial code his redress of grievance.

 

 

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                         

                       

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

8515 E. Orchard Road

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

 

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: ________________________ Dated:  08/01/06

                                       Brent Jones

 

 

 

 

Brent Jones

P.O. BOX 343

Schenectady, New York, 12301

                                    Amendments

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus, aka Brent Jones aka Brent O. Jones aka Brett Jones Theophilius, Brett Jones-Theophilius, aka Keeffe T. Branch, Keefe T. Branch, aka Keith Branch, aka K.T. Branch, aka B.J. UCC 1-207

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725-TJH

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

 

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

Complaint amendment necessary

 

                 It is incumbent upon myself to bring to the attention of this court, that the UCC financial Statement 05-7053517407 has been withdrawn, the plaintiff must amend their complaint, please order them to do so.

 

Note Exhibit A

 

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                          

                       

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of

the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

8515 E. Orchard Road

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: ________________________ Dated:  09/14/06

                                       Brent Jones

 

 

 

Brent Jones

P.O. Box 343

Schenectady, New York, 12301

                                

                        In the uNited States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Brett Randoff Toriano Keeffe Henry Kana-Shaphel Hithrappes Jones-Theophilus, aka Brent Jones aka Brent O. Jones aka Brett Jones Theophilius, Brett Jones-Theophilius, aka Keeffe T. Branch, Keefe T. Branch, aka Keith Branch, aka K.T. Branch, aka B.J. UCC 1-207

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725-TJH

Motion

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

Petition for REDRESS (correction of

wrongs) Jury trial demand, change of

address re-notification,

Appeal notification.

 

 

                 The attached document double sent to me by the so-called honorable Ms. Hatter is being returned as only the typed portion is decipherable. I’ve warned this court in the past not to send documents that

cannot easily be read and or understood. Federal district court rules require all documents submitted to meet certain uniform requirements. I have demanded the same, I refuse and reject the handwritten scratches of an individual. I’ve come to the conclusion of the dementia of this individual as a result of her inability to understand simple uncomplicated English.

 

                  Appeal notification

 

                  Any adverse decisions by this court is here by going to be appealed in accords with procedure, and while on appeal a stay of all decisions made by this court will be demanded, and once that happens it will prove the issue of Gate-Keeping.

 

                  The U. C. C. financial statement soon to be filed against the plaintiff’s attorney is clear, as a result of their accusations that have not been proven in any court against this particular respondent, militia slander in an attempt to prejudice and sway the jurist. It has nothing to do with the fact that the clerk’s of this court has repeatedly refused to file documents that conformed to court rules.

 

                  Response was timely, jury trial was demanded timely, and due process requires equal protection of laws, these are secured rights and cannot be denied any citizen of the united states. If anyone has any case law supported by annotated constitutional amendments please feel free to furnish and I’ll consider.

 

                  I spend more than three years in prison, I am in no way afraid of going back, especially in defense of Myself. There are those seem to want to test my resolve, I assure you in A to the zillions, power is what will be the results.

 

                        The to the documents in this court in response to the respondents petitions have not been filed, a separate in individual petitions, I have already alleged Gate-Keeping For which a UCC financial one statement has already been processed and filed against the horrible and sadistic Hatter and her accomplices.

 

                        And as I stated to this court, the U. C. C. financial one statement has been filed against more than one debtor. Great west life and annuity insurance company has already admitted that there was a contractual obligation, they are in a minute to receiving documents and refusing to respond, and no they seek to get a illegal judgment. We’ll see!

 

                        The following are facts that cannot be denied, and I assure you it would hardly matter if you tried.

 

                        We hold these truths to be self evident “That all men are created equal”, the so called founding fathers didn’t make those words up, for at acts 10:34, 35 “Jehovah is not partial... in every nation the

man.. is acceptable to him”. It is uniquely nice to know that your founding fathers recognized the sovereignty of every man, and as a sovereign citizen of the uNITED States, the constitution makes it against the law, a criminal act to harm a sovereign citizen.

 

UCC 9-401 take special note of section (a) (3) and

THIS CLAIM OF LIEN IS FILE PURSUANT CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 2872, 2874, 2875, 2881(1), 2883, and 2889, against Lien Debtor(s) for default and breach of contract under commercial law. Section 3281 of Civil Code for damages sustained. California Government Code § 27297.5 and 27387 as an involuntary lien based on consensual actions by knowledgeable breach of contract (explained herein). THIS IS NOT A LIS PENDENS LIEN.

 

                     "Due process requires, at a minimum, that an individual be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard prior to being subjected by

force of law to a significant deprivation. . . . That the hearing required by due process is subject to waiver, and is not fixed in form does not affect its root requirement that an individual be given an opportunity for a hearing

before he is deprived of any significant property interest. . . ." (Original

italics; 401 US 378- 379) Randone v. Appellate Department, 1971, 5 C3d 536, 550. "In the latter case [Mullane v. Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306] we said that the right to be heard ‘has little reality or worth unless one is informed that the matter is pending and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest.’ 339 U.S. at 314" Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 339, 340

 

                 In the absence of a response, when the LIEN DEBTOR was given

an opportunity to respond, the LIEN CLAIMANT [name1] hereby inserts and records this CLAIM OF LIEN against LIEN DEBTOR, [name2], jointly and severally in the total amount of [amount spelled out ($0.00)], said moneys to be paid in coin minted by the United States Mint, 31 USC 5112 Dollars. Said CLAIM OF LIEN is in the amount of criminal fines, penalties, and damages enumerated in a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION), received by the United States Attorney and United States Magistrate, which total ledger amount is secured by the real and personal community property of LIEN DEBTOR as follows: PERSONAL, REAL and MOVABLE PROPERTY OF AT [address] save that of LIEN DEBTOR’s wedding rings.

 

                 This CLAIM OF LIEN is filed pursuant the California Codes

and the Fundamental Commercial Law that has existed nearly 2,000 years:

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.,

395 U.S. 337, 349 Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d

 

                The first amendment of the uNITED States constitution says in part:

 

               “Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of grievance.”

 

               This simply means that we as citizens do not have to prove that The Commercial Lien Process (T.C.L.P.) is legal , but that judges and attorneys must prove by law, uNITED STATES Constitutional LAW, that such a process that is utilize by the uNITED STATES government is not available to citizens of the uNITED STATES.

 

              "The right to petition for Redress", to correct wrongs, is 100% lawful, RE read the first amendment once again and notice that it states "Congress shall make  no law..."  The Commercial Lien Process (T.C.L.P.) is a legal means of redress

 

                            The right to petition the government for A REDRESS OF GRIEVENCE. The Uniform Commercial Code, is a code set up by the governments of several countries and every

 state of the uNION. Because it (T. C. L. P.) requires a verified complaint, a signed affidavit, and notification of parties, these are the checks and balances set up by the system. Misuse of The Uniform Commercial Code can cause someone to become criminally liable if they seek such a redress remedy outside of good faith. Simply put if you lie on certain documents, you can be held criminally liable, you can be prosecuted. The T. C. L. P. meets the standards of the uNITED STATES Constitution:

 

                          1st , You have a right to redress, that right exist despite any attempts to ratify!

 

                                        2ND You have ‘the right to Equal Protection of laws’, This simply means that the uNITED STATES Federal government uses the commercial line process to it’s

advantage. If they use it, they cannot prohibit or prevent you from using it. To go with that the first amendment is law! And it is the only law that can never be changed, for it is the only one that states: ‘Congress shall make no law'.

 

                                       You have the ‘right to suit in equity’; this means if someone damages you, or your property, you have the right to make them pay by way of suit. When most people usually hear the term lawsuit they think of those that take place in court. There are several types of lawsuits, You have your civil suits, which can take many forms, oftentimes not involving a court at all (i.e.: arbitration), and then you have your criminal law suits.  Criminal

law suits can only take place as a result of the first amendment. That is where a branch of government steps in to correct a wrong, to redress wrongs committed against person, state,

property …

 

                                       Each amendment with the word “shall”, or “Shall not” are guaranteed, secured rights, or laws; This simply means these laws, or constitutional amendments as they are commonly known cannot be changed. And according to the tenth amendment, constitutional law supersedes state law. Don’t you just love those founding fathers?

 

                                        Example: When the first amendment states ‘Congress shall make no law… abridging…the right of the people… to petition… for a redress of grievance’. This right is guaranteed and secured by the statement “shall not”. Constitutional amendments with the words “SHALL”, or “shall not” cannot be amended or changed ever! That’s why they never have changed any of the amendments containing those words. 

 

                 Document has been filed with the Secretary of State California Uniformed Commercial Code Division UCC # 05-7053517407.

 

"As you can see" The Right To Petition For A REDRESS is recognized by all three branches of government, it is a LEGAL and LAWFUL right, and CANNOT (BY LAW {CONSTITUTIONAL Law) BE DENIED. IT IS A FIRST AMENDMENT GUARANTEED RIGHT RETAINED BY ALL CITIZENS!!!!!!!!!

 

State of Idaho v. Horiuchi

... towards the gen- eral government. . . . If [the people's] rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of

redress. Page 3. ... http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/rubyridge/idhoriuchi60501.pdf

 

Rufus Hanna and Donald Brennan v. Ray Leticia, et al.

... damages as set forth hereinafter; that inherent in plaintiffs' right to redress by exemplary damages are the following purposes: the defendants, and each of...http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/bumfights/bumfights100202cmp.pdf

 

Case Law, Federal and ... an alternative to the state justice system in which to obtain vindication and redress. Accordingly, even if a state police officer, a state prosecutor, or a ...

http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/briefs/99-5/99-0005.mer.rep.html

 

This is sound under standing:

 

The uNITED STATES Supreme court has recognized since the establishment of this country the right of the citizen to petition the court for redress, to correct the wrongs. And as explained earlier The Commercial Lien Process is one way a petition the government to correct the wrongs. And that all the appropriate documents through the UCC, must be filed with the government. So patiently understand the following: without the first amendment “right to petition the government for redress of grievance, no court could exist, in

order for the courts to exist there must be a law, ‘cause only by law could the courts derive their authority. Without the first amendment “right to petition the government for redress a grievance”, there would be no military, no police force, no fire department, there would be no justice system.

 

 

                 As we have seen over the past few decades, the court system in this country and throughout the world are by – in large corrupt. The more money you have the more justice you can achieve. It is not always feasible as respects to correcting wrongs, to utilize the uNITED States justice system. The amendment right “to petition the government for redress a grievance” is the number one principle by which The Commercial Lien Process is established. Again the word redress-to correct the wrongs; is the premise by which lawsuits are filed, for which cases against other individuals proceed in any court of the uNION. It is true that several of the amendments to the uNITED States constitution technically had never been legally enacted into law, they

were not properly ratified. So we don’t add any point suggest using amendments such as the thirteenth and fourteenth amendment of the uNITED states constitution. Do your homework people, several have recognized the right to file criminal complaints against judges. You must understand the prosecuting D.A. could not bring forth any case to represent any person, without that person exercising “the right to petition the government for redress a grievance”. It is the person whom signed a sworn affidavit (which is a part of The Commercial Lien Process), in which a person files a grievance, a complaint, asking for justice or for the wrongs to be corrected.

 

                     This is a matter of commerce, failure to act, breach of contract, failure to perform, failure to fulfill obligation, failure to provide, failure to negotiate, failure of good faith, violation of constitutionally secure rights, of ( the first, the seventh, the eighth, the ninth, and tenth amendment), as well as title eighteen of the criminal code of the united states constitutional amendments (U.S.C.A.), and lastly other Federal and state laws that is cognizable by every other state in the union.

 

                    Please keep in mind that the uniform commercial code is recognized by every government throughout the world who engage in any means of commerce among and between other nations. It is under these rules that the U.N. is able to sanction commerce between nations it. 

 

                    However it is the first amendment right of every citizen “to petition the government for a redress of grievances”, that is the most

secure of all rights and can never be denied “Congress shall make no law”. No judge, no horse, no tree, no building, no book, no man, no law exists that can take away this right.

 

                  In the state of California there’s no statute of limitations for murder which is alleged here, a felony.

 

                  In the state of California there’s no statute of limitations for an on-going conspiracy which is alleged here, a felony.

 

                  By the way the plaintiffs have filed with the government their petition for redress of GRIEVENCE (a civil lawsuit) asking the government to correct the wrongs they allege having been done them. If the court allows the suit to proceed they can not under law of due process and equal protection invalidate in any form, fashion, or way the respondents petitioning of the government through uniform commercial code his redress of grievance.

 

                 I request and demand a Jury Trial.

 

                 Address change has been given all parties, any documents received at the previous address will return to sender at undeliverable. And you receive address change notification for a reason.

 

                         Certificate of mailing                                                                                                  

 

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated:  10/22/06

                                       Brent Jones

By the way this is my official digital signature, this will remain on file throughout all proceedings.

                                    Signed: BJ UCC 1-207 Dated:  10/22/06

                                                            Brent Jones         

 

 

 

Visit our other sites

 

vodier@netzero.net

 

http://vodier.paradyne.tripod.com/

 

http://vodier0.tripod.com/

 

http://vodier0.tripod.com/                             

 

http://vodier2.tripod.com/  

 

http://vodier3.tripod.com/

 

http://vodier.tripod.com/together
 

http://vodier2.tripod.com/generalphotoalbum 
 

http://vodier.tripod.com/together
 

http://vodier0.tripod.com/thisisit

 

http://vodier3.tripod.com/

 

http://legalies.tripod.com/legal